Help: This page shows how the referencing vocabulary definitions are maintained and interlinked for controlled consistency of documentation. Click on the hyperlinks to see how the terms are defined within the Askemos architecture. more… Tip: Remember the back-button!

This page has three main sections. (Note that the listings could be empty.)

  1. The first item displays a term, URL, text or picture.
  2. Followed by a (still unordered) listing of statements about this subject. (for details follow ">"-link)
  3. Separated by a horizontal rule a "reverse" listing of statements referring to this item in object position.
1707 is a > bibliographic resource
1711 title > Feudal Security
1714 creator (jur.) > Bruce Schneier
1717 description > These vendors are becoming our feudal lords, and we are becoming their vassals. …Trust is our only option. … I Pledge Allegiance to the United States of Convenience
1709 issued > 2012-12-03
1762 see URL > Fedual security works given no alternative; otherwise it breaks.
2329 BTDT >

See Bruce Schneier: This essay essentially covers the topic of our background conversations mentioned in "about". He applies the same reasoning and even the analogy of feudalism. Askemos does just one thing here: assuming that there is an "evolutionary advantage" in civil societies above "state of nature"; and apply this recipe to networked security. Sum: create an "autonomous" thing, which can handle contracts.

Schneier on service providers and their fineprint as a security threat.

An outline for another unwritten article.

The historic chain of arguments:

  1. (Problem statement) What's an "operating system (kernel) at all?" (Asked a computer illiterate philosopher.) "Kind of rules of law for the 'territory inside' computers." (…Think of "process" as in computer slang akin to "citizens".)
  2. Wait, nice analogy. Given it holds (which happend to work in this case) beyond the moment… let's continue
  3. Then we could somehow classify OSes the same way as societies. Is this useful? How would we differenciate?
  4. Given individuals trusted to operate ("administrate", even initially set it up as a black box to use). Those could fail or even cheat. This is not enough to meet the requirements a human beeing has wrt. personal rights to their legitim state of affairs! At least not in a civil state.
  5. So we are at the moment (at best) in a feudal organisation. (See Bruce Schneier…)
  6. What's missing? … The logic, which transforms individuals, who may influence each other up to physical destruction into networks where "rights" (yet a other information in the machinery) extend beyond "death" (a.k.a worst case of dysfunction), making it not worthwhile to "kill". …One word: Enlightment (as is in philosophy) spelled the end to feudalism.
  7. Find the "root of recursion", implement it.
  8. Make this practical enough to silence those, who believe this being infeasible.

Give me a decade for number eight.

Now let's reach out.